District Grapples With Continued Gun Violence

Photo of D.C. police officers manning a checkpoint in the Trinidad neighborhood in Northeast on Monday by Alex Wong/Getty Images
IT WAS ANOTHER bloody night in the District last night. Eight people suffered gunshot wounds in three quadrants of D.C. and just over the District line in Prince George's County. (Get details here.) No deaths were reported, but the violence follows a spate of deadly shootings earlier this month, including one night in which seven people were killed.
D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty reacted to the crimes this morning, The Post's Clarence Williams reports:
Interviewed on WRC (Channel 4) this morning, D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty said he was troubled by the spate of shootings and working to get more police officers onto the street to address it. But he noted that the homicide rate remains far lower than it was a decade or two ago, and he said crime prevention efforts had to focus on stanching the flow of weapons to the streets.
One of those efforts, the military-style checkpoint that D.C. police erected in the crime-scarred Trinidad neighborhood in Northeast last weekend, received renewed criticism today from Post columnist Marc Fisher. And, he says, he's not alone in his opinion:
[T]wo men who ordinarily find themselves on opposite sides of law enforcement issues -- the head of the D.C. police union, Kris Baumann, and the legal director of the Washington office of the American Civil Liberties Union, Art Spitzer -- agree that the checkpoints unconstitutionally infringe on our freedom to move about and that they create the aura of taking action but don't much interfere with the thug life.D.C. police officials told The Post last night that the checkpoint will continue to be in place until Sunday. It had been slated to end Wednesday."We end up bothering the good people of the world," Baumann says. "It's a PR move."
Spitzer notes that homicides are actually relatively flat citywide in recent years, though there's been a big jump this year in that part of Northeast. "The sad answer is that there may be nothing that prevents crime in a crowded urban area in the summertime," he says.
Is violent crime in the summer months a sad, uncombatable reality? Are the D.C. police on to something by trying new tactics to keep gunslingers out of hard-hit neighborhoods? Or is the checkpoint really just a heavy handed publicity stunt?
What do you think? Leave your thoughts below in the comments section.
» "Eight People Shot During Violent Night" [WaPo]
» "Liberty Takes a Holiday in Occupied Trinidad" [WaPo]
The End of the Line
Techies Swarm in Arlington to Snag Newest iPhone
Long-Delayed Capitol Visitor Center to Open in December








Like (








Addison Road
Geeze. We should institute a gun ban to prevent this sort of thing!
By Matt Boyd , Posted June 12, 2008 10:17 AM” Most worrisome is what looks like a pattern in which Fenty and Nickles attempt to combat crime by restricting liberties.”
-By Marc Fisher | June 12, 2008; 8:48 AM ET
It appears that the Fenty-Nickels junta have positioned their “armed enforcers” (police officers or gestapo agents?) around a section of Washington, D.C. to prevent some American Citizens from freely using certain ‘public’ streets. Looks to be a modified type of ‘Martial Law’ by a publically funded law enforcement agency (police deartment) – but now- a private army of Fenty, approved by Nickels.
Fenty and Nickels need to be arrested before they cause a rebellion like the one King George III did a couple of hundred years ago.
Martial law on-demand in Baltimore
By Dan Wild , Posted June 13, 2008 10:14 PMMay 17, 2007 12:37 PM
Public gatherings restricted? Check. Shutdown of independent businesses? Check. Lockdown on traffic and transportation in the area? You bet. Lawmakers in Baltimore trying to curb the city's homicide rate (already 108 this year) have come up with some "desperate measures" of questionable constitutional legality, including heightening police presence in order to lockdown streets in "emergency areas." It has been called, "partial martial law" by some, and one has to wonder if the city of Baltimore may not do better to take a page from The Wire's Hamsterdam for a solution to their inextricably linked drug and homicide issues.
posted by dead_ (60 comments total)
The bill was introduced by Robert W. Curran, a Democrat??
The fact that this kind of proposal is even being considered in America shows how freedom is being systematically undermined on a national level and the post 9/11 police state mentality is filtering down to the local level.
The media reaction to ask "is this a good thing?" shows just how far down the road towards a police state we now are, when just a few years ago such proposals would be considered ludicrous and would be universally denounced without debate.
MSNBC ran a report which asked "are curfews a good idea?" Former Baltimore police commissioner Ed Norris described the proposal as "the most ridiculous thing I've heard in a long time, a horrible thing, and an act of desperation."