Baggage Check: Stupid Human Tricks

| Print Post This | Like (0) | Comments (0)

Dr. Andrea Bonior dives into the world of psychology.

VIRTUALLY ALL OF YOU have heard about David Letterman's admission of sexual relationships with underlings on his show, which came to light late last week after an alleged extortion attempt by the ex-boyfriend of one of the women.

Breaking the news himself, Letterman's remarks were clearly well-thought out and carefully planned to protect his image; he was reflective but humorous; played the victim but also one who has made mistakes; showed a bit of remorse but also rather minimized — and was vague about — his transgressions.

The court of public opinion is usually the only one that matters when it comes to marketing, television ratings, and popularity. And initial verdicts were favorable; audiences were surprised and sympathetic. Many latched on to the notion that Letterman is not a public official, so his private life (or the flaws therein) is of no importance to them.

But here's the rub: people might not expect Letterman to be a saint in his private life. But that's actually quite different than being comfortable with believing he might be a hypocrite. It remains unclear what the fallout will be from Letterman's mistakes.

But don't make the mistake of assuming that all flaws in famous people are created equal in our minds.

David Letterman's trademark of calling public figures out on their secret lives — sleeping with interns, anyone? — won't generate the same comedy if we believe he is up to the same tricks.

Ironically, it's not the judges, attorneys or jury that we put our highet faith: it's often the court jesters for whom we have the toughest standards of all.